Death Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,560
Doty v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Petitioner: Wayne C. Doty
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff: JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner: Gavin Howard
Respondent: Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Jones v. Tim Shoop
as 24-3356
Petitioner: PHILLIP L. JONES
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Leslie Galloway, III
Defendant: Burl Cain, Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party: Charles Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11280
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent: HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Hall v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner: Gabriel Hall
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Delacruz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner: Isidro Miguel Delacruz
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner: Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?