Cases 1 - 10 of 375,442
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2024cv01427
Plaintiff:
Mario Sanchez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Albritton v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01424
Plaintiff:
Devinche Javon Albritton
Defendant:
State of California and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONLEY v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES DONLEY
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAJOR CRIMES CAMDEN COUNTY and CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldomor v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baldomor
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, GCCF and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoyt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoyt
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Joseph Padilla
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
