Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,189,558
(PC) DePonte v. Stohl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff: David Arthur DePonte
Defendant: Stohl, Stern, J Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pantoja et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024at00749
Plaintiff: Amado Pantoja and Maria de Lourdes Vera
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffrey McComber and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Labrum (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01651
Petitioner: Daniel Cole Labrum
Respondent: A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner: Earl D. Miller
Respondent: A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dinh v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff: Truong Jason Dinh
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinh v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01043
Plaintiff: Truong Jason Dinh
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff: JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant: SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant: KEVIN WELLS, BILL EDDINS, TERRY TERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00298
Petitioner: Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner: Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?