Cases 51 - 60 of 355
LINDER v. WIKIPEDIA.ORG et al
as 1:2010cv01566
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. LINDER
Defendant:
WIKILEAKS.ORG and WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chisolm v. Anderson
as 3:2010cv00574
Defendant:
Doug Anderson
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Polizzi et al
as 1:2010cv02109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches doing business as Bernard Madoff also known as Faisal Shahzad and Faisal Shahzad
Defendant:
Nicole Polizzi other Snooki doing business as Jersey Shore, Paul Delvecchio, Mike Sorrentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Al-Awlaki
as 1:2010cv02089
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki, Nidal Malik Hasan, Osama Bin Laden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Riches v. Amanda Hughes, et al
as 10-6038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, aka Steve Jobs; dba Apple Computers Ipad CFO
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA HUGHES, aka Amanda Leigh Hughes; dba RDAP Drug Treatment Staff and RESIDENTIAL DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM
Wilson v. Flaherty
as 3:2010cv00536
Petitioner:
Eric C. Wilson
Respondent:
W. Steven Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
De'Lonta v. Fulmore et al
as 1:2010cv00838
Plaintiff:
Ophelia De'Lonta
Defendant:
R. Fulmore, Anthony Scott and Eddie Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dick v. Fahey
as 3:2010cv00505
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Dick, Jr.
Respondent:
Helen Fahey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Harold Jackson
as 10-6693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HAROLD STEVEN JACKSON, a/k/a Ears
Derek Tice v. Gene Johnson
as 09-8245
Petitioner - Appellee:
DEREK ELLIOTT TICE
Respondent - Appellant:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
