Cases 1 - 10 of 299
SMITH v. PITMAN et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Defendant:
INDIANA HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ERIC SMITH, TOM LINKMEYER and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Ortiz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv02733
Defendant:
Unidentified Party, Dr. Ham and Randy Smith
Plaintiff:
Henry Louie Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Dept. of Corrections Parole and Probations et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections Parole and Probations, Steve Everly, Chris Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Kirk Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Correct Health Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Dr. Gore, Daniel Fleischman and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Donell Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01623
Defendant:
Adams, Latoya Hughes, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Willie L Richardson
Defendant:
. Bruce, Randy Smith, . Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, J Smith, Unidentified Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heuerman et al v. Rinse Repeat Ventures Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Defendant:
Rinse Repeat Ventures Incorporated and Randy Smith
Plaintiff:
Joel Hale and Jeffrey P Heuerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
