District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 426,298
MEBANE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
LEMAR MEBANE
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI FOREST, MARIENVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRUNNER v. GILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BRUNNER
Defendant:
ALYSSA GILSON and KRISTIN MCHENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEGHENY PLASTICS, INC. v. YOST et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY PLASTICS, INC.
Defendant:
WALTER MILTON YOST, II and DENISE CAROLINE GARGASZ-MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
REDMOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv02652
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LLOYD v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER WICZKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Neal Forte
Defendant:
City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Little et al v. Farmers Insurance Group d/b/a Economy Preferred Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Sharon Little and Scott Little
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP doing business as ECONOMY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
GARCIA et al v. POLYMER80, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
HECTOR GARCIA and ROSEANN MORRISON
Defendant:
POLYMER80, INC., MARCUS BURNEY, JOHN DOE(S) FIREARM SELLER(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
