Fourth Circuit Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 565,698
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
F&M Investment, Inc. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
F&M Investment, Inc.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Allen et al v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen, Charles Thomas, Zoey Hott and others
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation doing business as ViaPath Technologies
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Violation of Federal Communications Act
Mawyer v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jeff Mawyer
Defendant:
State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felix v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Benjamin Arellano Felix
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hairston v. Henry County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jamun Daray Hairston
Defendant:
Henry County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Patrick County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
James Jonathan Turner
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail and Jackie Bird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
