U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 24,876
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WISE v. USA
as 1:2025cv00238
Petitioner:
KENNETH MALIK WISE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2025cv00242
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY BERNARD BROWN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ANDREWS PROPERTIES OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC et al v. CITY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2025cv00236
Plaintiff:
ANDREWS PROPERTIES OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC, ANDREWS PROPERTIES AND RENTALS LLC and ANDREWS PROPERTIES OF THE TRIAD, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF BURLINGTON and CITY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
NEAL v. MAY
as 1:2025cv00234
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID L. MAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRAHAM v. HODGES
as 1:2025cv00235
Petitioner:
LITHOMAS D. GRAHAM
Respondent:
BRUCE A. HODGES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2025cv00237
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT LAURA and LIEUTENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SN SERVICING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2025cv00232
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
SN SERVICING CORPORATION and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee for LB-Ranch Series V Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
HART v. USA
as 1:2025cv00233
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CLINE v. DUDEK
as 1:2025cv00231
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CLINE
Defendant:
LELAND DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
