Louisiana Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 369
Murla et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2019cv13175
Plaintiff:
Peter Murla and Brenda Murla
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v Girod Loanco, LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv13099
Not Yet Classified:
Regina Heisler
Defendant:
Girod LoanCo, LLC and Regina B Heisler
Plaintiff:
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BlueTarp Financial, Inc. v. Robertson Development, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13006
Defendant:
Lawrence Q. Robertson, Robertson Development, LLC and Lawrence Robertson
Plaintiff:
BlueTarp Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
as 2:2019cv12854
Plaintiff:
Alan Kirkendoll
Defendant:
Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LiftForward, Inc. v. Abu Maria, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Twins Food Mart, LLC, Anood, LLC, Abu Maria, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LiftForward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v Schiller, Jr.
as 2:2019cv10160
Not Yet Classified:
John D. Schiller
Plaintiff:
Michael E Blake
Defendant:
John D Schiller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
USA v. Richard
as 2:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Richard R Richard
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 631
2921 New Highway 51 SBL LLC v. Martin et al
as 2:2019cv09182
Defendant:
LaPlace Veterinary Clinic, LLC and Kia Martin
Plaintiff:
2921 New Highway 51 SBL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
as 2:2019cv07942
Plaintiff:
Alan Kirkendoll
Defendant:
Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Lambremont v. Lenderman
as 3:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Mark D Lambremont
Defendant:
Kristina Marie Schoemann Lenderman
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
