Eighth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 234
Wolf v. Altmann
as 4:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Wolf
Defendant:
Daniel N. Altmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Courtelis v. Rosenberg et al
as 0:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Kiki Courtelis
Defendant:
Kailen Rosenberg and Global Love Mergers, Inc. doing business as Kailen Love and Life Architects
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Nicozisin et al v. Gleason et al
as 4:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
Alexander Nicozisin and Mary Jacklyn Nicozisin
Defendant:
George Gleason, Tim Hicks, Dan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanhope et al v. Kokron et al
as 0:2021cv01263
Defendant:
Janet Kokron and Gary Kokron
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Wood Lasher and Jack Stanhope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tunick v Brown et al
as 0:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Amy E. Hood, Herbert L. Henkel, David B. Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Tunick
Blackburn v. Roman et al
as 0:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Amy E. Hood, Michael L. Eskew, David B. Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Blackburn
Petersen et al v. Mack et al
as 0:2020cv01686
Plaintiff:
James Barry Petersen, James Mazzo, James Mazzo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Hanson, James J. Spencer, Liyuan Woo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petersen et al v. Mack et al
as 0:2020cv01685
Plaintiff:
James Barry Petersen and James Mazzo
Defendant:
Michael J. Hanson, Digiliti Money Group, Inc., James J. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rockwell v. Gorman et al
as 0:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Laura Kelly Gorman, Anjeanette Cayot and Laura Kelly
Plaintiff:
Cindy Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rockwell v. Kelly Gorman et al
as 4:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Laura Kelly Gorman, Anjeanette Cayot and Laura Kelly
Plaintiff:
Cindy Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
