Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20,578
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and N Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Does
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Shock et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Shaleen Cecile Manning
Defendant:
Andy Shock and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Smith
as 5:2024cv06063
Plaintiff:
Kenderal Rogers
Defendant:
Cassie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
