Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 22,736
Bradford v. Konadle et al
as 4:2024cv00861
Defendant:
Kathren Shuler, Mike Konadle, Brieann Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bi Haven Investments
as 4:2024cv04105
Defendant:
Bi Haven Investments
Plaintiff:
Torin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riemer v. Unknown Greene County Missouri Deputies et al
as 5:2024cv05215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthew Riemer and Tom
Defendant:
Sheriff James Arnot and Unknown Greene County Missouri Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. USA
as 5:2024cv05213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Krystle Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Velazquez-Diaz v. Young et al
as 5:2024cv05212
Defendant:
Dustin Sanders, Rachel Young, Kelley Hinely and others
Plaintiff:
David Velazquez-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hayes
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickson v. Kelley et al
as 4:2024cv00848
Defendant:
Pine Bluff Police Department and Courtney Kelley
Plaintiff:
Trevion Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Russell et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Edith Elliott, Shane Russell and Jessica Hess
Plaintiff:
Joseph Blake Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Lake et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Defendant:
Sandra Lake, Andrea Culclager and Majorie Parrott Hall
Plaintiff:
Charles Pruitt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Derrick et al
as 4:2024cv00849
Defendant:
Doe, Deangelo Earl, Steven Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Xehan Edmund Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
