Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 7,521 - 7,530 of 27,958
Griggs v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01244
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Griggs
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, S Stehle, Jennifer Mata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Michael et al
as 6:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ford
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Mike Batista, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujano v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01250
Petitioner:
Zachariah Matthew Lujano
Respondent:
Paul Penzone, John Arnold, Michelle Tuley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01237
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jamal King
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa Correctional Health Services and Richard Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Shove v. McDonald, et al
as 18-15707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE C. SHOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
MCDONALD, Warden, Captain, ARNOLD, Lieutenant and GRANT, Doctor
Everett v. Patterson et al
as 4:2018cv02384
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Everett
Defendant:
Patterson, State of California and C.D.C.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salley v. Apker et al
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Salley
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Theresa M Talplacido, Louis W Winn, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duckworth #117491 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01266
Plaintiff:
Gary Duckworth
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Daniel A Barker, Rollin J Stinely, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mora-Contreras et al v. Peters et al
as 6:2018cv00678
Defendant:
John Does, Zachary Gould, Meghan Leddy and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Mora-Contreras and Shane Staggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campillo v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
Tony M Campillo
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Carla Hacker Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
