Torts - Injury Cases

Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 471
Roxanne Kline v. Docs at the Door, P.C., et al
as 24-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROXANNE KLINE, individually
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Roxanne Kline
Defendant / Appellee: DOCS AT THE DOOR, P.C. and AJIBOLA A. AYENI
Defendant: GATEWAY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and JOY H. TURNER-AYENI
USA, et al v. Ajibola Ayeni, et al
as 24-1109
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Roxanne Kline and ROXANNE KLINE, individually
Defendant / Appellant: AJIBOLA A. AYENI and DOCS AT THE DOOR, P.C.
Reybol v. OnTrac Logistics et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff: Arcelio Joseph Reybol
Defendant: OnTrac Logistics and WorkWhile
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Ferguson et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Maria Del Carmen Gamboa Ferguson and United States of America
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Pacita Whatley v. Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center
as 24-1006
Plaintiff: PACITA D. WHATLEY, REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant: OAKBROOK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Unknown v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
US v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 23-2086
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee: REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Interested Party: GENENTECH, INC. and ROBERT J. TERIFAY
In re: Sealed Case
as 23-7159
Doe v. Planned Parenthood
as 23-11184
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alex Doe, Relator
Defendant / Appellant: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Incorporated
US v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al
as 23-1958
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?