California Torts - Injury Cases

Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,247
Dennis C. Payne et al v. Abb, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01713
Defendant: YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to FRICK COMPANY), VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY), AMERICAN COMPRESSOR COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: Susan Payne and Dennis C Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant: PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke and Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pizarro, et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08425
Defendant: John Crane Inc., Astra Flooring Company, Darcoid Company of California and others
Plaintiff: Renato C Pizarro and Mercedita D. Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pizarro v. John Crane Inc.
as 3:2019cv08424
Defendant: John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff: Renato C Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burch et al v. DBMP LLC et al
as 4:2019cv08236
Defendant: Allied Fluid Products Corp fka Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., Certainteed Corporation, DBMP LLC and others
Plaintiff: Amy Schwartz, Ashley Burch-Hughes, Cindy Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Patrick W. Dennis et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09343
Plaintiff: PATRICK W DENNIS, ROSA DENNIS and Patrick W. Dennis
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Petitioner: VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spurlin et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02049
Plaintiff: Dale M. Spurlin and Mary Spurlin
Defendant: Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09064
Defendant: The Boeing Company, United Technologies Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Arthur Rosengren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?