Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,873
Phoummany v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv03849
Petitioner:
Sompheth Phoummany
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haywood v. USA
as 0:2024cv03844
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Keith Haywood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morales v. MN Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv03825
Defendant:
MN MCF - Faribault Medical, Paul Schnell, Jodi Ahnsted and others
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Critt v. Warden, MCF - Rush City
as 0:2024cv03828
Respondent:
Warden, MCF - Rush City
Petitioner:
Justin Marshall Critt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes-Salinas v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03808
Petitioner:
Julio Reyes-Salinas
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goodman v. Peters
as 0:2024cv03818
Petitioner:
Isaiah Goodman
Respondent:
Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bierbrauer v. DOC et al
as 0:2024cv03812
Defendant:
Chrystal Anderson, Henry D, Dettloff and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bierbrauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv03804
Petitioner:
John Wayne Brooks
Respondent:
Jerad Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckhanan v. USA
as 0:2024cv03798
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tichich v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv03792
Respondent:
Paul Schnell and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Thomas Robert Tichich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
