US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 81 - 90 of 23,838
STRAYHORN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
JIMMY JAY STRAYHORN, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCRAE v. PATRELLA et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
PATRELLA, TAMARA RUSH, MICHAEL PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE MORALES v. UNION COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
VANUZIA DE MORALES
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JACOBSEN v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
KAREN JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
DE MORALES v. ALEMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
VANUZIA DE MORALES
Defendant:
SIMON MAYO ALEMAN and AMAYRA FONZ TELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
D.M. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
G. M.
Petitioner:
D. M.
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Sgt. Kyle Krawczyk, Officer Jamison Keltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
CHADLEY DEAN ALLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TEPEDINO v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
ALLISON TEPEDINO
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
WELCH et al v. SPECTRUM SOUTHEAST, LLC
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY WELCH and VINCENT CARTER
Defendant:
SPECTRUM SOUTHEAST, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
