US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 3,311
IN RE: WILSON
as 2:2022cv04863
In Re:
VINCENT WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MEYER et al
as 2:2022cv04836
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
ERNEST MEYER, HAKEEM BROWN, RASHON WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR et al
as 2:2022cv04794
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, PHILADELPHIA CITY COUNCIL, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN
as 2:2022cv04746
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIUS BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: MONTAGUE
as 2:2022cv04718
In Re:
MICHAEL MONTAGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMORE v. TAYLOR ET AL
as 2:2022cv04648
Plaintiff:
KHALIL GILMORE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS 1-4, Officer Clyde Taylor, Jr., Officer Roy Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMMARATA v. THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) et al
as 2:2022cv04645
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMMARATA
Defendant:
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC), JOHN V. DONNELLY III, ESQ., DUSTIN RUTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS et al
as 2:2022cv04605
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS, F.C. KERBECK, SHERIFF SALES ACTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES-EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2022cv04608
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES-EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, JOYCE ULLMAN, DUANE MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
