US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 111 - 120 of 50,901
FATIR v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
AMIR FATIR
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BLACK v. COINBASE, INC.
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. BLACK, III
Defendant:
Coinbase, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
HIGH FLOW FUNDING, LLC v. ARLINGTON PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
HIGH FLOW FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
ARLINGTON PARTNERS, INC. and HANK WERNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Tomaszewicz v. Camillo
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tomaszewicz
Defendant:
Jason Camillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VARGO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J VARGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and ADAM P WASSELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
