US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 101 - 110 of 50,999
Williams
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ryan Williams
Defendant:
County of Butler, Pennsylvania, Butler County Prison, Prison Board of Butler County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024mc00437
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
VINCE v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
MARY VINCE
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
SPEAR v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
MELISSA SPEAR
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
