Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,809
HARRELL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY B. HARRELL
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN and RESTRICTED HOUSING UNIT OFFICERS AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES AT SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOOM v. AMMERMAN, et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
CARL BLOOM
Defendant:
JUDGE FREDRIC J. AMMERMAN, PROTHONOTARY BRIAN K. SPENCER, CLEARFIELD PROBATION DEP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. BAZEL et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Defendant:
DR. SEED BAZEL and REGISTERED NURSE ANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. CALIGURI et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
E CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE, DR BASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS, SR.
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyahla, Sr. v. Youngkin, Sr. et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Tyahla, Sr.
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Sr., Derrick George, John Gablick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY B. HARRELL
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN and RESTRICTED HOUSING UNIT OFFICERS AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES AT SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY GIBBS, JR.
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MERCER-SPENCER v. SPENCER et al
as 5:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
DEBRA M. MERCER-SPENCER
Defendant:
NATHANIL BRONDON SPENCER, SR., BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS and THE ARRESTING OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
