U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,011
McNemar v. Marshall et al
as 2:2025cv00062
Plaintiff: Robert McNemar
Defendant: William Marshall, III, Jonathan Frame, Josh Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meredith v. Warden
as 1:2025cv00061
Petitioner: Marquita Leigh Meredith
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Merrifield v. Frame
as 3:2025cv00059
Petitioner: Michael K. Merrifield
Respondent: Jonathan Frame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Warden
as 5:2025cv00060
Petitioner: Kensha S. Carter
Respondent: F.C.I. Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reese v. Warden
as 5:2025cv00058
Petitioner: Danyell D. Reese
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Warden
as 1:2025cv00056
Petitioner: Kervin Johnson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Warden et al
as 5:2025cv00055
Petitioner: Dennis Lee Williams
Respondent: Warden and Camp Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00054
Petitioner: Leo Antoine Smith
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Furlow-Smiles v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv00050
Petitioner: Barbara Furlow-Smiles
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv00051
Petitioner: Jmyla Elaine S. White
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?