US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,914
Payne v. Fox et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Defendant:
F.C.I. Medical Dept. Fox, Mr. Tilley and Jane/John Doe
Plaintiff:
Henry Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conley v. USP Hazelton
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Reno Conley
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McLaurin v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00591
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
Gerquan McLaurin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hayes v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hayes
Defendant:
Medical Director Jamie Gray, Nurse Practitioner Lacey, Commissioner William K. Marshall, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00590
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Kaleb Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
David Ellis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hatten v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00589
Petitioner:
Montez Hatten
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Nunely
as 1:2024cv00586
Respondent:
Warden Nunely
Petitioner:
Javier Martinez-Turcio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baldwin v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00538
Defendant:
1 unnamed Kanawha County Sheriff, Derrick Williams and 4 unnamed U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Tristan Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravely v. Hinchman
as 3:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Gravely
Defendant:
Brady Hinchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
