US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,919
Ellis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
David Ellis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hatten v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00589
Petitioner:
Montez Hatten
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Nunely
as 1:2024cv00586
Respondent:
Warden Nunely
Petitioner:
Javier Martinez-Turcio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baldwin v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00538
Defendant:
1 unnamed Kanawha County Sheriff, Derrick Williams and 4 unnamed U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Tristan Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravely v. Hinchman
as 3:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Gravely
Defendant:
Brady Hinchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messer v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Cleve H. Messer
Defendant:
Sgt. William Miller, Sgt. Timothy Perkins and Cpl. Alan Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Johnny S. Hobbs
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Heckard et al
as 5:2024cv00581
Defendant:
Hodovan, Staples, Mr. B. L. Fain and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blanchard v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Derric Blanchard
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kawczynski v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00578
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ashley Kawczynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
