US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,946
Barnett v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00636
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Derrick Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00637
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Brianna Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mitchell v. Warden, FCI McDowell
as 1:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Aldo Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
LaShonda Renee Harris
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2024cv00632
Defendant:
Timothy Barnett, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Elbryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Butterworth v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00631
Defendant:
Orkin Pest Control and South Central Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Butterworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rydbom v. McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rydbom
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Derek McKinney, William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00623
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
Christopher Wynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goodluck v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Avery Goodluck
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00619
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Barron Bernard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
