Cases 11 - 20 of 49,424
Konick, Trustee v. Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
David L. Konick, Trustee
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DEESE et al v. FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEESE and JEANNE DEESE
Defendant:
FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. and FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
NEPTUNE v. COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
FRANTZ NEPTUNE
Defendant:
COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION and DAVID J. DARIGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Dollar v. Anne Arundel County, MD et al
as 1:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
James Jason Dollar
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County, MD, Michael Shier, K. Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Evangelista v. Taylor Ridge Homeowners Association et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
Luxanna Evangelista
Defendant:
Taylor Ridge Homeowners Association, Conway Management and Duraclean Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Thomas Jacobi Allen v. US
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. JACOBI ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raynor v. The United States et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. Raynor
Defendant:
The United States and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
