Cases 1 - 10 of 134,996
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tolbert v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02121
Petitioner:
Richard Tolbert
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Langley v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02122
Petitioner:
Darnell Langley
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02123
Petitioner:
Jamal Lewis
Respondent:
Tom Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blevins v. Maynor et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Denver W. Blevins
Respondent:
Timothy Maynor, April Parker and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stone v. Director of BOP et al
as 5:2024ct03158
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stone
Defendant:
Director of BOP and NC DAC Prison Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Jackson
as 0:2024cv03620
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Wilkins
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scarborough v. Early
as 1:2024cv03646
Petitioner:
Sammy Lee Scarborough
Respondent:
Curtis Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Micheal Hedrick
Respondent:
Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
