Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 12,887
HOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01536
Plaintiff: SHERMAN G. HOLLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Siddell v. Burch
as 3:2024cv00910
Plaintiff: Leroy George Siddell
Defendant: Valerie Burch
Wang v. Sussman et al
as 1:2024cv03987
Plaintiff: Liang Wang
Defendant: Sammy Sussman, Vox Media, LLC and New York Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bacon et al v. Randall
as 1:2024cv02246
Plaintiff: Robert Bacon and East Cobb Spine & Sport Chiropractic, LLC
Defendant: Hailey Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lukacz v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Defendant: Anna Maria Anderson, Anna Campanella, Jennifer Lukacz and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Lukacz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Campbell v. Dell Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00711
Plaintiff: Barbara Campbell
Defendant: Dell Technologies, Inc., Chad Bope and Todd Lieb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
YANCY-EL v. KELLY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff: PAMELA P. YANCY-EL
Defendant: CHRIS KELLY and BRIAN KAMAUF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Rueger
as 24-1463
Plaintiff: MITHUN BANERJEE and MALANCHA BANERJEE
Defendant: TIMOTHY S. RUEGER, Montgomery County Police Officer and RICHARD M. LUTHER, Montgomery County Police Officer
Stephen Kelly v. Kathy Hensel
as 24-2045
Plaintiff: Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant: Kathy Hensel, individually
Harrison v. Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: William C. Harrison
Defendant: Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. and Jewelers Board of Trade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?