Cases 11 - 20 of 184,666
Weidner et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11818
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Goulds Pumps LLC, Henkel Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Wayne G Weidner and Sandra M Weidner
Cross-Complainant:
General Electric Company, ABB, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC and others
Cross-Defendant:
General Electric Company, ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Aubrey Dutschmann v. Goulds Pumps LLC
as 24-2201
Plaintiff:
AUBREY DUTSCHMANN
Defendant:
GOULDS PUMPS LLC
Sanders et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv04070
Defendant:
Metalclad Insulation LLC, individually & as successor-in-interest to Northern California Insulation, Inc., The William Powell Company, Hill Brothers Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jay W. Sanders, Jr. and Judy M. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LeBoeuf, Jr. v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01695
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Underwriters At Lloyds London and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan J. LeBoeuf, Jr.
Cross-Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC, Paramount Global, Eagle, Inc. and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and Avondale Industries, Inc
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and Avondale Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Sanders v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc SII Copes-Vulcan
as 3:2024cv04057
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc SII Copes-Vulcan, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Jay W. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brittan et al v. Greene, Tweed & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03874
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, 3M Company, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. and others
Cross-Complainant:
Redco Corporation and Crane Co.
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Brittan and Nancy Brittan
Cross-Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., Morse Tec LLC, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
JOSEPH K. BOETTCHER and CATHERINE A. BOETTCHER v. ABB INC., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company et al
as 2:2024cv02788
Defendant:
REDCO CORPORATION f/k/a Crane Co., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, PEP BOYS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH K. BOETTCHER and CATHERINE A. BOETTCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Thurn et al v. Boeing Company (THE), et al
as 1:2024cv00596
Cross-Defendant:
Boeing Company (The), UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION-HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND DIVISION, McDonnell Douglas Corporation and others
Defendant:
Boeing Company (The), UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION-HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND DIVISION, McDonnell Douglas Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
JULIUS THURN and PATRICIA THURN
Cross-Complainant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Monlux v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Valves and Controls US Inc formerly known as Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc doing business as Atwood & Morrill Co Inc, WestRock Company, Cleaver-Brooks Inc formerly known as Aqua-Chem Inc doing business as Cleaver-Brooks Division and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Monlux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Leslie Chappel et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04628
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Armstrong International, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Chappell and Leslie Chappel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
