Cases 41 - 50 of 18,829
United States v. Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2024mc00091
Defendant:
Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $20,000 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$20,000 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Various Parcels of Real Property
as 24-2371
Defendant:
VARIOUS PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY JELANI C. SOLOMON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Various Vehicles Titled in The Name of Jelani Solo
as 24-2372
Defendant:
VARIOUS VEHICLES TITLED IN THE NAME OF JELANI SOLO JELANI C. SOLOMON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Montayvious McKinnon
as 24-12375
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
MONTAYVIOUS MCKINNON
USA v. Currency
as 6:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $68,950.00, MORE OR LESS, IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 7:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
$68,950.00, more or less, in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $11,200.00 U.S. Currency
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,200.00 U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Assorted Jewelry With an Appraised Value of Approximately $1,404,940
as 3:2024cv01722
Defendant:
Assorted Jewelry With an Appraised Value of Approximately $1,404,940
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $51,276.88 et al
as 5:2024cv00867
Defendant:
$51,276.88 and $25,810.92
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
