Cases 131 - 140 of 384,977
Rios v. ENTEL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2024cv04946
Plaintiff:
Enox Rios
Defendant:
ENTEL SYSTEMS, INC. and JOHN DOE (Said Name Being Fictitious & Intended to be the Driver of the Defendants Motor Vehicle)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Sullivan v. City of Escondido et al
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sullivan
Defendant:
City of Escondido, Escondido Officer James White and Doe Escondido Police Department Officers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Alamouti et al v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv05560
Plaintiff:
Masoumeh Motevalli Alamouti and Moshen Rahmati
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. Tolman et al
as 5:2024ct03163
Plaintiff:
Ricky Payne
Defendant:
Phillip W. Tolman and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv04973
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 holdings, LLC
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04983
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05527
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04972
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
