Cases 41 - 50 of 384,224
Farrell v. Benchmark Services, LLC and Doe Corp. Utilizing Telephone Numbers
as 1:2024cv04494
Plaintiff:
Huyen Farrell
Defendant:
Benchmark Services, LLC and Doe Corp. Utilizing Telephone Numbers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
SHANNON RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS, DUKE UNIVERSITY, RHINE RESEARCH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Doe et al v. Lakeside Womens Hospital LLC
as 5:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lakeside Womens Hospital LLC doing business as Lakeside Womens Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
HARRIS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCINNI, NICOLE SOLANE KONDRLIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Justis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Justice
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Berrios
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Louis Turner
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
