Cases 91 - 100 of 38,371
Reed v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04152
Defendant:
FNU Wyatt, Travis Terry, Anne Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Givens v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2024cv04156
Defendant:
Christopher Eston, Dustin Loucks and Jesse Schmidt
Plaintiff:
William H. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bey v. LakeView Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv03538
Plaintiff:
Mallah Bey
Defendant:
Jay Bray doing business as CFO, Geske and Cook, PA and LakeView Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Gillette Childrens' Hospital et al
as 0:2024cv03530
Plaintiff:
Jonah Reed
Defendant:
Barbara Joer and Gillette Childrens' Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
