Cases 71 - 80 of 351,046
Lyndon Elder v. J. Smith, et al
as 24-2235
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Elder
Defendant:
J. Smith, K-9 Unit, Hot Springs Police Department, Doe, Hot Springs Police Officers 1-3, Chief of Police Chris Chapmond and others
Timeless Bar, Inc., et al v. Illinois Casualty Co.
as 24-2245
Plaintiff:
Timeless Bar, Inc., doing business as The Press Bar and Parlor, Horseshoe Club, LLC and Jessie Welsh
Defendant:
Illinois Casualty Company
George v. Grounds For Termination, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Grounds For Termination, LLC, BV Products, LLC and Daren Donnelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. $2197 US Currency
as 6:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2197 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Davis v. Braun et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sheldon George Davis
Defendant:
Colby Braun and North Dakota Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Scott v. USA
as 4:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Brandon Desha Scott
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Damion Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardlow v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Wardlow
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
