Cases 1 - 10 of 73,817
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01797
Petitioner:
Santee Howard
Respondent:
Red Lake band of Chippewa and Red Lake tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sayers v. Redlake Band of chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01799
Petitioner:
Dezmyn Sayers
Respondent:
Redlake Band of chippewa and Redlake nation courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Nebraska Superior Court
as 8:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyriece Washington
Respondent:
Nebraska Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schurman v. Luke
as 4:2024cv04100
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent:
Steven Luke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lightfeather v. Jensen
as 8:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Grant Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
