Cases 11 - 20 of 231,990
Howarth v. A Better Real Estate Group, LLC
as 1:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
A Better Real Estate Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Blakely v. Clearly Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Alan Blakely
Defendant:
Clearly Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Four Batons Wireless, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Four Batons Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Impulse Communications, Inc. v. Uplift Games, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Impulse Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Uplift Games, LLC, Treetop Games LLC and Lionfield Investments Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Sangoma Technologies Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Estech Systems IP, LLC
Defendant:
Sangoma Technologies Corp., Sangoma Technologies Inc. and NetFortris Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
