Cases 41 - 50 of 830,607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Robinson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
Michael Alonzo Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bivings (PS) v. Arapahoe Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Kayla S. Bivings
Defendant:
Arapahoe Department of Human Services, Darlene Locke and Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robin v. Olson et al
as 3:2024cv01508
Plaintiff:
Jincy Robin
Defendant:
Harvey Olson and S & J Potashnick Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Lovett et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Janice Mercury Lovett and Rodney Clinton Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
Martin v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michelle Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
