Cases 41 - 50 of 371
Gonzalez-Cruz v. Morales-Santiago
as 3:2021cv01322
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Gonzalez-Cruz
Defendant:
Vanessa M. Morales-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz Marrero v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2020cv01723
Defendant:
United States, Louis DeJoy and US Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Lydia Cruz Marrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01689
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jeannite v. AutoZone Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv12202
Defendant:
Amani Woods, Angel Cruz and AutoZone Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rivera-Cruz v. Municipality of Guayama, et.al.,
as 3:2020cv01448
Defendant:
Municipality of Guayama, Carmelo Martinez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Rivera-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castro-Cruz v. Municipio Autonomo de Caguas et al
as 3:2020cv01394
Defendant:
Natural and Environmental Resources Department, Jane Doe, Any Other ELA Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Castro-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
