Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Vidal-Ramirez v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Michael Vidal-Ramirez
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Carlton National Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ciarametaro v. City of Gloucester, et al
as 22-1700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS J. CIARAMETARO
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOUCESTER, MA, CHARLES PAYSON, individually and as Gloucester's City Solicitor, JAMES DESTINO, as Gloucester's former Chief Administrative Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Powers v. Community Resources for Justice, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00775
Plaintiff:
John Jay Powers
Defendant:
Community Resources for Justice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
