Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford
as 1:2020cv11824
Defendant:
Town of Chelmsford
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Chang et al
as 3:2019cv30037
Defendant:
Danny Lee, Robert Chang, Newegg.com Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. Koutoujian et al
as 1:2018cv12436
Defendant:
steven sinatra, Lieutenant Brian Crane, Telly Jack and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Richardson
Not Classified By Court:
Edward F. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kelly
as 1:2018cv11102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
Danny M. Kelly
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
Fone et al v. Brito et al
as 1:2016cv11508
Plaintiff:
Donald Fone , Deanne Fone and Donna Keefe
Defendant:
Danny Brito , Corey Erickson , FNU Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Serra et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv30066
Plaintiff:
Danny Z. Serra and Idalina Z. Serra
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelly v. Day et al
as 1:2016cv10560
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Kelly
Defendant:
Richard J. Day and Town of Chelmsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOSLEY,ET AL. V FANDUEL, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2016cv10272
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc., FanDuel Inc. and FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DANNY DAHL and TONY MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gould et al v. O'Leary et al
as 1:2016cv10181
Defendant:
O'Leary, Daniel C. O'Leary, David A. Provencher and others
Plaintiff:
Gould, Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., Michael Gould and others
Intervenor Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. USA (
as 3:2016cv30018
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Danny Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
