Cases 11 - 20 of 528
Werkmeister v. Wayne Bank
as 1:2024cv10813
Plaintiff:
Ian Werkmeister
Defendant:
Wayne Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. Salisbury
as 24-1218
Petitioner:
JOSHUA DAVIS
Respondent:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR. and WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., Acting Director of Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Wayne v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10571
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wayne
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pawochawog-Mequinosh v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Wolf Pawochawog-Mequinosh and Brian Keith Brownell
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury, William . Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longacre v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10169
Plaintiff:
Wayne Neil Longacre
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richards v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10141
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Richards
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
