Cases 31 - 40 of 522
Wrinn v. Champion Specialty Services, LLC Provider
as 1:2023cv12840
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wrinn
Defendant:
Champion Specialty Services, LLC d/b/a Champion Specialty Services Provider and Champion Specialty Services, LLC doing business as Champion Specialty Services Provider
Torres et al v. True North Capital Properties, LLC
as 1:2023cv13120
Plaintiff:
Gerald Torres, Isaac R Torres, Jayvanni R Torres and others
Defendant:
True North Capital Properties, LLC and Randy (last name not provided)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
LDG Medical Services Group, L.L.C. et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
LDG Medical Services Group, L.L.C., Integrity Medical Group, Corp., Instituto Medico Familiar Inc. and others
Defendant:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Caremark Puerto Rico, L.L.C., Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff:
Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant:
New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant:
The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant:
BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner:
Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Graniero v. Unum Group et al
as 1:2023cv12434
Plaintiff:
Richard Graniero
Defendant:
Unum Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Sramcik v. Unum Group et al
as 1:2023cv12165
Plaintiff:
Julie Sramcik
Defendant:
Unum Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Guang v. Impagliazzo et al
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
August Guang
Defendant:
David Impagliazzo, Charles Vieira, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Del Sesto et al v. Prospect CharterCARE, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00328
Defendant:
The Angell Pension Group, Inc., CharterCARE Community Board, Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence and others
Plaintiff:
Caroll Short, Gail J Major, Stephen Del Sesto and others
Interested Party:
Michael W Field and Lydia Corvese
Receiver:
THOMAS HEMMENDINGER
Special Master:
Deming E. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Coalition of Black Leadership, et al v. Smiley, et al
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COALITION OF BLACK LEADERSHIP, MICHAEL VAN LEESTEN, The Coalition of Black Leadership, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, CURTIS MORRIS, The Coalition of Black Leadership, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRETT SMILEY, Mayor, Providence, Rhode Island, STEVEN M. PARE, Commissioner of Public Safety, Providence, Rhode Island, OSCAR L. PEREZ, Chief of Police, Providence, Rhode Island and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE K. WASHINGTON
MACOMBER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
LEAH MACOMBER
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PROVIDENT LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
