Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10024
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kann v. Moniz
as 1:2018cv12638
Respondent: Superintendent Antone Moniz, Mathew Whitaker, Todd Lyons and others
Petitioner: Mohammed T. Kann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01139
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00653
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40194
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12319
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00670
Plaintiff: Kevin Whitaker and Lamont E. Paige
Defendant: FCI Berlin, Warden and FNU Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Defendant: Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff: Bret Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANILO LOPES
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, ANTHONY MENDONSA, THOMAS M. TOCCI and others
Defendant: JOHN BELAND, PETER WALKER, RANDY FISHER and others
Whitaker v. KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11329
Plaintiff: Sean Whitaker
Defendant: KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?