Cases 41 - 50 of 2,676
WHEATON et al v. T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHARON A WHEATON and MICHAEL P WHEATON
Defendant:
T Y INTERNATIONAL and T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hafner v. Mills, et al
as 24-1137
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Maine Governor, AARON M. FREY, in his official capacity as Maine Attorney General, SHENNA BELLOWS, in her official capacity as Maine Secretary of State and others
Mazza v. City Of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10333
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mazza
Defendant:
City Of Boston, Frank J. Olbrys, Edward Kennealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Town of Worthington et al
as 3:2024cv30024
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Brooks
Defendant:
Town of Worthington, Charles S. Rose, Amy C. Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patten v. Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10293
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Patten
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Carrick v. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10289
Plaintiff:
Ms. Elizabeth J. Carrick
Defendant:
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ayala v. Municipality of Lajas et. al.
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Ana T Ayala and Ana T. Ayala
Defendant:
Municipality of Lajas and MAPFRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
