Cases 41 - 50 of 68
City National Bank v. Barros et al
as 1:2013cv12516
Plaintiff:
City National Bank
Defendant:
Edward H. Barros and West Rodney French Boulevard Realty Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STILE v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, SOMERSET COUNTY SHERIFF, DAVID ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 12-2284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
French v. JP Morgan Chase Home Finance
as 12-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Lonsdale Concrete Construction, Inc. v. French Design Builders Incorporated et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Lonsdale Concrete Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
French Design Builders Incorporated, KCorp Technology Services, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Germain Plumbing and Heating, Inc. v. French Design Builders Incorporated et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Defendant:
French Design Builders Incorporated, KCorp Technology Services, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
The United States for the Use and Benefit of Germain Plumbing and Heating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-2096
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Defendant / Appellant:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-1904
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Defendant / Appellant:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1806
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL, GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST, LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY, d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HARDEN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
SUSAN DUDLEY, MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
