Cases 51 - 60 of 217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Monteiro v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2020cv00952
Petitioner:
Elsio Monteiro
Respondent:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Boston Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yanes, et al v. Martin, et al
as 20-1762
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CENTRAL FALLS DETENTION FACILITY, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Petitioner:
OSCAR YANES, WENDELL RAFAEL BAEZ LOPEZ, ELMER ALFREDO AREVALO CARRILLO and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11311
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sallaj v. Barr, et al
as 20-1649
Petitioner:
SHAHDAN SALLAJ
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, "ICE", CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae:
LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Molina, et al v. Albence, et al
as 20-1629
Petitioner:
ADRIANO DA SILVA MEDEIROS, LUIS ORLANDO DURAND LUYO and JOSE MARCOS PALACIOS MOLINA
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, U.S, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
