Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,782
US v. Fulcar
as 24-1524
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: REY DAVID FULCAR
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff: MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Wood v. Bank of America , N.A.
as 1:2024cv11430
Plaintiff: David Wood
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Efron v. UBS Financial Services Incorporated
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff: David Efron
Defendant: UBS Financial Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Howard v. Bisenius, et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff: DAVID W. HOWARD
Defendant: THERESA A. BISENIUS, JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK, MARY RUDOLPH BLACK and others
Trenkler v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10780
Petitioner: Alfred Trenkler
Respondent: Warden David Rich and Warden Freddie Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cronan v. Nerhona et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff: Laurie Cronan
Defendant: Peter Nerhona, Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briggs, et al v. Scanlan
as 24-1316
Plaintiff: LYNN-DIANE BRIGGS, WAYNE P. SAYA, SR. and KAREN TESTERMAN
Defendant: DAVID SCANLAN, Secretary of State, NH and CHRIS AGER, Chairman, NH Republican State Committee
Interested Party: NORMAN J. SILBER
Type: Civil Rights Voting
McGovern et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant: William Bailey and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGovern et al v. William et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant: Bailey William and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?