Cases 1 - 10 of 194
HEACOX v. CASTONGUAY
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M HEACOX
Defendant:
BRYAN CASOWAY and BRYAN CASTONGUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEACOX v. CASTONGUAY
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M HEACOX
Defendant:
BRYAN CASOWAY and BRYAN CASTONGUAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Cronan v. Nerhona et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Defendant:
Peter Nerhona, Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roane v. GRMC, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11070
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Roane
Defendant:
GRMC, Inc. doing business as Garrett Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Callier v. Direct 2 Home LLC
as 3:2024cv30005
Defendant:
Direct 2 Home LLC, D, Bradley Pereira and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Callier
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cornell v. Lamboy et al
as 1:2023cv12405
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Cornell
Defendant:
Brandon Lamboy, Christopher Rodgers, Wellpath Employee #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SEC v. Bendelac
as 23-1790
Plaintiff / Appellee:
US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER BENDELAC
Defendant:
TRENDS INVESTMENTS INC., BRANDON ROSSETTI, CLINTON GREYLING and others
Rich v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12410
Defendant:
Masterbuild Manufacturing Company, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Masterbuild Manufacturing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guo v. Tomkiewicz et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Hongnian Guo
Defendant:
Brandon Tomkiewicz and Amy Huff-Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
