Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lavalley v. Natrol, LLC
as 3:2021cv30104
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lavalley and David Barnard
Defendant:
Natrol, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jones v. Mitchell, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DOUGLAS L. BOWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA A. MITCHELL, MICHAEL DEVINE, JOHN F. CAMELO and others
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2016cv11666
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Bennett, Department of Correction, Executive Office of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavalley v. USA
as 1:2016cv00199
Petitioner:
Daniel M. Lavalley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cahoon, Jr., et al v. Shelton, et al
as 10-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND W. CAHOON, JR., JOSEPH A. NAPPA, LUCIO MONTELLA, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL KANE, SR., ROLAND CREVIER, JOHN CAMPION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OSCAR SHELTON, individually and in his official capacity as the Director of Personnel for the City of Warwick, SCOTT AVEDISIAN, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Warwick, DIANA PEARSON, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Solicitor for the City of Warwick and others
Cahoon, Jr., et al v. Shelton, et al
as 08-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND W. CAHOON, JR., JOSEPH A. NAPPA, LUCIO MONTELLA, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OSCAR SHELTON, SCOTT AVEDISIAN, DIANA PEARSON and others
Cahoon, Jr. et al v. Shelton et al
as 1:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Joseph A. Nappa and others
Defendant:
Oscar Shelton, Oscar Shelton, Scott Avedisian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
