Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Gordon et al v. Neronha et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Rev. Alan L. Gordon and Rev. Anne S. Armstrong
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha, Robert P. McKenna, State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
McKenna v. Hard Bottom Fisheries, Inc.
as 23-1791
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES T. MCKENNA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARD BOTTOM FISHERIES, INC.
MCKENNA v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
CHAD MCKENNA
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKenna v. Hard Bottom Fisheries, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10748
Plaintiff:
James T. McKenna
Defendant:
Hard Bottom Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Acevedo v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Mr. Algensis Acevedo
Defendant:
City of Providence, Brendan McKenna and Ryan Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Patch et al v. Town of Hingham et al
as 1:2022cv11295
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Patch
Defendant:
Town of Hingham, Chief Taylor Mills, Timothy Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner:
FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent:
PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
