Cases 1 - 10 of 29
USA v. $23,100.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
as 3:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$23,100.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Interested Party:
Jose Luis Reynoso-Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Reynoso v. Endres et al
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Denorah Reynoso
Defendant:
Kyle Endres, Raleek Byfield, William Sherrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynoso-Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Marina L Reynoso-Navarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reynoso v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2021cv01566
Plaintiff:
Marcos A Reynoso
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, US Department of Justice and Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Pharmacare, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pharmacare, Inc., China District PR LLC, Quality Transport & Distribution LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Reyes et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB doing business as Christiana Trust, not individually but as trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust
Defendant:
Mildred M Reynoso, Jose Reyes and City of Warwick - Building Department
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
US v. Reynoso-Drullard
as 19-1319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EDREOLINDO REYNOSA-DRULLARD and EDREOLINDO REYNOSO-DRULLARD
Reynoso v. USA
as 3:2019cv01100
Petitioner:
Manuel Humberto Reynoso
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
